Rows: 15, Columns: 15Words: 66, Blocks: 34Missing: {JQVXZ}This is puzzle # 87 for Mr. Ashwood-Smith.Grid flow: 51.4Saturday freshness: 50%
Martin Ashwood-Smith notes:
I like to construct two kinds of themeless puzzles: stacked 15 puzzles and puzzles with wide open centers. Today's puzzle is an example of the latter.
Jim Horne notes:
Jim here, sitting in for Jeff Chen, who is reading aloud to his kids. It's been over three years since we've heard from Canadian ... read more
Jim here, sitting in for Jeff Chen, who is reading aloud to his kids.
It's been over three years since we've heard from Canadian constructor Martin Ashwood-Smith, and I'm pleased to see his byline again. Martin is mostly known for what is sometimes derisively called "stunt puzzles" but this one is a standard Saturday, complete with some great clues like "inheritance powder" for ARSENIC.
What is a stunt puzzle? Click on Martin's author page and you'll see many grid-spanning stacks and lots of open white space. This puzzle isn't a pangram, but pangram authors also get called out for the same sin: "making a puzzle that's fun for the constructor instead of for the audience."
This is clearly a grave moral failing. The sentiment that constructors should repress their own selfish desires to create crosswords that appeal to the masses is so obviously true, it's not worth questioning.
And so, I question it.
No other art form comes with this expectation. Can you imagine a painter or sculptor or opera composer being told that rather than do what pleases them, they should only innovate within comfortable standard forms? Fiction writers, for example, get the opposite advice. "Don't copy the formats or styles of others. Do what delights you. Let your authentic voice shine through. That's the only way to find both joy in your work and success."
I asked a few people why crosswords might be so different from other art forms, and the most interesting answer I got was that people don't consider crosswords art. To them, it's a service, like Internet or electricity. That hadn't occurred to me. But if crosswords aren't art, why not?
I'm often reminded that crossword commentators are not representative of casual solvers, but it's not just the critics who feel strongly about this. Joe Krozel, another ground-breaking innovator, was regularly both praised and pilloried for his creativity, including in online comments.
Crosswords are different, somehow. People take them very seriously, with rigid expectations.
AI results are often bogus, but can sometimes be insightful or entertaining, and occasionally even helpful.
Analyzing...
Statistical Analysis
Day of week comparisons
Rebus puzzles are ignored when calculating averages. Flow averages also exclude disconnected grids.
Distribution of answer words by length
Letter distribution
Scrabble Score: 1
2
3
4
5
8
10
Thumbnails
Various thumbnail views are shown:
Standard view shows the grid pattern most clearly
Open Squares (those which don't touch any block, even diagonally) are blue
Vowel distribution
Scrabble score uses the same color key as above
Freshness view shows unique answers in red (see colorized grid below)
With answers
Puzzles that may be similar to this one
Crosswords that share the most words with this one:
Unusual or long words that appear elsewhere:
Identical grids
Other puzzles with the same block pattern as this one:
Topologically similar grids
Colorized grid for Sat Sep 24, 2022
The next two sections attempt to show how fresh the grid entries are.
In this view, unusual answers are colored depending on how often they have appeared in other puzzles.
Unique answers are in red, red overwrites orange which overwrites yellow, etc.
Unique
1 other
2 others
3 others
4 others
Freshness Factor
Freshness Factor is a calculation that compares the number of times words in this puzzle have appeared
in other Modern Era puzzles. Click here for an explanation.
The chart below shows how many times each word has been used across all NYT puzzles, old and modern including Variety.