This grid pattern reminds me of an explorative set of themelesses by David Steinberg. All of them had central parallelograms, the ...
read moreThis grid pattern reminds me of an explorative set of themelesses by David Steinberg. All of them had central parallelograms, the first with a wide one, another that was more sectioned, and yet another tuned in with learning gleaned from his prior work.
Trent's parallel splash into paralellogram themeless world more than GETs ER DONE — five strong entries across the middle, especially for those hold 'em players out there. (RIVER CARD is slang for the final card, coming after "the flop" and the "turn card.")
There's not much running vertically through these marquee entries that's exciting, but there's nothing gluey, either. Such a smooth solving experience.
Like in some of David's works, the corners of Trent's creation are sectioned off, the NW and SE especially so. It was much easier to flow into the other two corners, and I appreciated the amazing color in the upper right: IT WASN'T ME / SO I GATHER / HIDEY HOLE paints quite a picture.
Sectioning presents such trade-offs. I'd love more flow heading into each of the four corners, but letting a constructor work on a subregion independent of the rest of the grid can result in greatness. I'd take READ ALOUD / TRIAL DATE / HAND MODEL any day for the price of some bottlenecking.
Nice results in the heavily choked-off corners, too. I doubt those giant 7x5 chunks would be possible if Trent opened things up, like moving the black square below YIELDS up one and the black square below ON TOE down one.
It's frustrating to get stuck in an isolated corner of a crossword, but if it's going to happen, I want subsections as strong as each of Trent's.