Great use of the Schrodinger convention today, resulting in an amusing theme. This is the only puzzle in the NYT Shortz era with a ...
read moreGreat use of the Schrodinger convention today, resulting in an amusing theme. This is the only puzzle in the NYT Shortz era with a single Schrodinger square, but it's used well for the theme, and the crossing answer isn't tortured at all for either answer, both SET and SEAT being perfectly fine answers for "Box ___". Well done!
I had a pause in the last two theme entries. I usually solve on computer, so ????NEWSPAPER baffled me for the longest time. I'd be very curious to know what percentage of people solve on paper still. I'll bet it's quite high, but dropping. Perhaps THIS NEWSPAPER will still be fine for the majority of solvers today, but I bet in ten years it won't. I personally tried to construct a xw with this exact same theme four years ago (I failed), and remember having real trouble coming up with a way to incorporate NEWSPAPER so it had a symmetrical entry.
And A SUNBURNED ZEBRA flows so much better to my ear than A SUNBURNED PANDA. Perhaps that's just the way I've always heard the joke, but I refused to take ZEBRA out of that space for the longest time. A thought: how cool would it have been if ZEBRA/PANDA had been five additional Schrodinger squares? Extremely hard to do, of course, if not impossible. Schrodinger squares are so difficult to pull off such that the clue works equally well for both possibilities, and when you stack five of them in parallel, it quickly becomes a Gordian knot.
Dan only has four theme answers, so he spices things up by adding in the very nice EPHEMERA, DOWAGERS, and JOHANNES. I'm not convinced BALL YARD is "a thing", but it's passable, and I bet many would disagree with me (vehemently!). Dan takes great care with the rest of his fill; I only really noticed TYRO, SSI, OKEY, etc. as lesser offenders.
Overall, a theme that comes across as a bit old-fashioned, but a well constructed puzzle. I love Dan's great attitude, going back to improve the puzzle even after puzzle acceptance. I want to see more constructors shooting for the stars, striving for perfection.