For me, every New York Times submission is like an incarnation of Schrödinger's cat — a submission is both rejected and accepted (or ...
read moreFor me, every New York Times submission is like an incarnation of Schrödinger's cat — a submission is both rejected and accepted (or is it neither rejected nor accepted?) until I hear back about it. And no matter what the response is, I'm always surprised and amazed. Acceptance? Total shock! Amazing!! Didn't expect that! Rejection? Total shock! What?! I loved that puzzle!
I know that makes no sense, but it's somehow true. This puzzle was no different — I was shocked that it was accepted. I won't point out its flaws to you though, in case you don't see them.
The seed for this puzzle was ZOOM FATIGUE, which I was worried about using, lest it be irrelevant after a year or two. Luckily for me, this puzzle is being published just 13 months after I first submitted it, which seems like a very short time given how many themelesses are in the queue. Unluckily for me, I continue to experience ZOOM FATIGUE on a weekly basis.
Lastly — many thanks to Rafa Musa!! Without him, this puzzle would not exist. I emailed Rafa shortly after ACPT 2025, asking him to collab on a themeless. He took pity on this themeless newbie and very generously said yes. This spawned a cursed puzzle that generated over 40 emails and many, many grid iterations. Our shared clue spreadsheet tabs read "Sheet1", "new! clues", "new! new! clues", and "new! new! new! (lmao) clues". But through that process --- the filling, the refilling, the clueing, the re-clueing --- I learned so much about the art of constructing a themeless. I'm addicted now.
I'd still love to share an NYT byline with Rafa one day, and I hope that not all of our collab attempts are destined to be cursed… But I think I'll pitch him a themed puzzle, just to be safe.
(I'm also forever pitching to Kevin Curry that we collab on a themeless, but I've yet to get him to bite. Someday!)