STER additions. I enjoyed DRAGSTER QUEEN, giving me the image of an amped-up Danica Patrick. Hard to argue with that! I also liked the ...
read moreSTER additions. I enjoyed DRAGSTER QUEEN, giving me the image of an amped-up Danica Patrick. Hard to argue with that! I also liked the fact that David alternated his four themers, adding -STER to the first word in themers 1 and 3, and to the second word in themers 2 and 4. Nice and balanced.

As a writer, I get mired in grammar sometimes. That happened to me today, with HIPSTER FLASK and FLASH MOBSTER. I could buy the first one if the clue had been something like [Seattle boho chic liquor container?], but the actual clue referring to an alt-rock concert felt like it should have been HIPSTER'S FLASK. And FLASH MOBSTER … as vivid as the image of a flashy mobster is, shouldn't it be FLASHY MOBSTER?
We writers are a truly annoying bunch.
I liked a lot of David's long fill, PARATROOPER (dropping in the down direction!) and RECORD LABEL in particular. CHASE SCENE also was interesting, but 1.) CAR CHASE feels more zippy and 2.) I kept on getting confused as to where the -STER should go in the entry. I do often appreciate long bonus across answers that aren't theme-related, but today those entries confused the theme for me. Felt a little inelegant.
Curious to see the ELOI make an appearance in a Steinberg puzzle. The fill is so smooth otherwise — why would David have included the esoteric sci-fi race? I can see the allure though — with the snazzy RECORD LABEL and WOE IS ME in place already, and the great 1984 PROLE term a possibility along with AD REP … it might seem so worth it to accept the heavy dab of crossword glue. Always the trade-offs.
I wanted all four themers to hit on the nose (WHAT A DUMPSTER ["That's such a pretty trash receptacle!"] actually came to mind before David sent me his notes! It made me laugh, but it's a fair point — DUMP / DUMPSTER are too similar.). That didn't happen, but there were enough bonuses to keep me entertained.